Wednesday, March 25, 2009

They told me I was going to lose the fight


I’ve been a little unsure as to how to explain this post.

I’ve tried to think of a pithy, succinct catchphrase that could sum it up.

But I failed. The closest I’ve come to explaining it, is to say that I’m debunking popular opinion. Or kicking some sacred cows. Or basically admitting that there are some things in music that I just do not get. And I know I’m not alone. I can’t be. Whether we care to admit it, we’ve all been there. Bought a record that reviews rave about and been left cold. Listened to an album that is constantly name dropped as an influence and been left bewildered. Heard a band so ingrained in popular culture that they’re beyond criticism and felt like an outcast. There’s a kind of bullshit mystique built up around certain bands and records, that not liking them makes you something of a leper. An outcast from musical society. Shut out in the cold. The lone voice that dares not speak out in opposition, lest they be lynched.

And it’s not just a case of not liking the music. It’s more than that. I’m sure we can all think of plenty of bands and records we don’t like but which we can appreciate why others would. But there are some records and bands whose elevated status and seemingly untouchable nature is beyond comprehension. It goes beyond merely not liking it to a whole other level. One where not only do you not get it, you can’t understand why others do. Or at least, you can’t comprehend the adoration that surrounds it and you wish someone would sit you down and explain it to you. So you buy it and intermittently return to it. Hoping you’ll suddenly see the light. Waiting for the road to Damascus moment to happen.

Only it never does and halfway through you turn it off, put something else on and file it away back on whichever shelf or box it came from. It’s something similar to that article I mentioned where people were lying about the books they’d read, in order to appear more intelligent. A kind of culture snobbery. One where, such is the myth and status surrounding the record or the band, you feel embarrassed if you have to admit to not liking them. A lesser music fan for not being able to see what the fuss is all about. As though there’s something wrong with you. When really it’s only you that sees the truth. It’s only you who can see past the wall of praise, of legend, of critical acclaim, of groundbreaking innovation and hear the record or band for the middling lump they really are. So I thought I’d offer up a few records and bands whose reputations and critical acclaim simply baffle me.

1. The Basement Tapes by Bob Dylan & The Band. Now I love Dylan and I understand why the mystique of this home recording session arose. But surely the official release would have been completely obliterated that when everyone got to hear what a bunch of half baked, dull as arse songs they were.

2. The Stone Roses. Average band makes average record with below average singer.

3. The Libertines. Tabloid baiting trampy like druggy with literary aspirations fronts generic indie band draped in the emperor's new clothes .

4. All noise bands. I've tried and tried to find even the smallest amount of enjoyment but seriously, it’s just noise.

5. Pink fucking Floyd.

So there you have it. Feel free to list anything you don’t get in the commenets. Or if you feel like pissing in thew ind, you can attempt to show me the light on any one of those. In the meantime, here are a couple of classic songs by artists whose elevated status I do get.

Kate Bush - wuthering heights (live session version) original version available on 'The Whole Story'

Robert Wyatt - shipbuilding (live session version) original version available on 'His Greatest Misses'

/

8 comments:

Jan said...

I never could warm to Pink Floyd either. Regarding the common sense about popular music, I also feel very awkward by struggling to value Radiohead, Bloc Party (especially their 2nd album), The Who, REM, and Rufus Wainwright.

Whereas I know a couple of people that dont give a fond about f.e. Led Zep. A true riddle to me.

Btw, by noise bands you probably mean real noise, and not bands that use some noise... Sonic Youth, NIN, Godspeed! ?

Mister P said...

With you across the board except...

...except on The Stone Roses!

Yes, Ian Brown was (is) a limited singer, but Squire's guitar work? And a rhythm section that made it alright for indie-kids to dance in the late-80s? And the ground-breaking sleeve art? Their look? Some might say that without them, there would have been no Oasis, no Blur, no 90s guitar bands, no Britpop... (some of these things may or may not have been a good thing, I'll leave all that to personal preference...)

What I will say is that I defy anyone to listen to all eight glorious minutes and twelve seconds of I Am The Resurrection without getting something good out of it... try this to see what I mean...

drew said...

Didn't get Kate Bush back then, even less so now and I won't start on the loveable moptops or that Irish band.

Rachel said...

Well... We part ways on the Pink Floyd... Which is odd because we don't part ways often. Pink Floyd is all about memories for me though, listening to their music I always think of my dad. :-)

Quite honestly though I am right there with you... I don't understand half the stuff that is popular and critically acclaimed... And like you I have tried so many times to listen and hear what all the others seem to be hearing but to no avail... Like Sufjan Stevens... It just doesn't click.

Jim said...

Prince - I don't like the music, I don't like him, and I don't like anything he stands for. One of my Smiths mates from way back raved about Prince, he thought he was a musical genius - I just don't get it.
I disagree about Floyd - without them I wouldn't have found a lot of music.
Radiohead - I loved the first album, I've struggled with all the rest.
Kate Bush - I loved her when I was a kid (well okay a teen) but I do have problems listening to that stuff now.
The only Wainwright I like is Martha. It was very in to like Loudon and all the other earnest folkies when I was a student, but the only ones to survive through to today are Fairport and Richard Thompson (who IS a musical genius).
Sufjan Stevens! Ick! Yuck.
Billy Prince thingey - I don't get that either.
Animal Collective - unfocused Arcade Fire.
Man, I'm sounding old and grumpy... they don't write songs like they used to!!!

Ste said...

With you apart from The Stone Roses (classic first album) and Floyd did release 2 great albums ('Dark Side Of The Moon' & 'Wish Yuo Were Here') and influenced Radiohead heavily. The Libertines were way too hyped.
On a different note, any chance of a re-up for the acoustic with strings version of 'A-Punk' by Vampire Weekend? can't find it anywhere! No worries if you can't, thanks in advance if you can.

Kim E. said...

I completely understand where you're coming from, and as a result I have a lot of music I own but can't bear to listen to. Captain Beefheart, Jeff Buckley, Love, Cream, The Smashing Pumpkins, Neutral Milk Hotel, Gram Parsons... etc. Or sometimes you might find that your least favorite album by a band or artist is their most revered. I love U2, but rarely listen to The Joshua Tree, for example

Still, there are certain artists I never thought I'd like, because while most are quick to appreciate them, for others it's an acquired taste. I disliked Bob Dylan for many years, but kept his music in my library, until one day it 'hit' me, and I've loved his work ever since. And so, like a determined teacher which his stereotypical urban poor class, I refuse to give up on this music.

zico said...

U2... can't fathom why they are so loved.